The impact of legislation on psychotropic drug use in nursing homes: a cross-national perspective

TitleThe impact of legislation on psychotropic drug use in nursing homes: a cross-national perspective
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2000
AuthorsHughes C.M, Lapane K.L, Mor V., Ikegami N., Jonsson P.V, Ljunggren G., Sgadari A.
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume48
Issue8
Pagination931-7
Date PublishedAug
Accession Number10968297
Keywords*Accidental Falls/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data], *Drug Utilization/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data], *Facility Regulation and Control/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], *Home Nursing/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], *Prescriptions, Drug/sn [Statistics & Numerical Data], *Psychotropic Drugs/ae [Adverse Effects], *Psychotropic Drugs/tu [Therapeutic Use], 0 (Psychotropic Drugs), Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Comparative Study, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Female, Geriatric Assessment, Human, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Logistic Models, Male, Restraint, Physical/ae [Adverse Effects], Restraint, Physical/lj [Legislation & Jurisprudence], Retrospective Studies, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, sweden, United States
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the impact of legislation on nursing home residents, psychotropic drug use, and the occurrence of falls in the US compared with five countries with no such regulation. DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study SETTING: Nursing homes in five US states and selected nursing homes in Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Japan, and Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Residents in nursing homes in five US states and the aforementioned countries during 1993-1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using data collected using the Minimum Data Set, logistic regression provided estimates of the legislative effects on the use of antipsychotics and antianxiety/hypnotics while simultaneously adjusting for potential confounders. The occurrence of falls was evaluated similarly. RESULTS: Prevalence of antipsychotic and/or antianxiety/ hypnotic use varied substantially across countries. After adjustment for differences in age, gender, presence of psychiatric/neurologic conditions, and physical and cognitive functioning, residents in Denmark, Italy, and Sweden were at least twice as likely to receive these drugs (Denmark Odds Ratio (OR)=2.32; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), 2.15-2.51; Italy OR=2.05; 95% CI, 1.78-2.34; Sweden OR=2.50; 95% CI, 2.16-2.90); in Iceland, the risk was increased to greater than 6 times (OR=6.54; 95% CI, 5.75-7.44) that of the US. Residents were less likely to fall in Italy, Iceland, and Japan compared with the US, despite more extensive use of psychotropic medication, whereas residents in Sweden and Denmark were more likely to fall. CONCLUSIONS: Policy has had an impact on the prescribing of psychotropic medication in US nursing homes compared with other countries, but it is unclear if this is translated into better outcomes for residents.

Alternate JournalJ Am Geriatr Soc