A new assessment for elders admitted to acute care: reliability of the MDS-AC

TitleA new assessment for elders admitted to acute care: reliability of the MDS-AC
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2001
AuthorsCarpenter G.I, Teare G.F, Steel K., Berg K., Murphy K., Bjørnson J., Jonsson P.V, Hirdes J.P
JournalAging (Milano)
Volume13
Issue4
Pagination316-30
Date PublishedAug
Accession Number11695501
Keywords*Acute Disease, *Geriatric Assessment, *Hospitalization, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition, Databases, Factual/*standards, Female, Human, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Assessment, Patient Discharge, Reproducibility of Results, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Abstract

Assessment of older people rarely includes functional domains critical for ensuring optimum outcome of treatment in acute hospital care. We report the development of a new assessment instrument, and illustrate how differences between pre-hospital and hospital admission status can be systematically evaluated using the Minimum Data Set for Acute Care (MDS-AC). Content was developed by literature review and consultation with professionals working in acute areas. Dual independent assessments were conducted on hospital in-patients in 4 countries. Inter-assessor reliability coefficients were calculated for each item. Kappa was calculated for all binary and multi-level nominal variables. Quadratically weighted Kappa was estimated for all ordinal multi-level variables. Where one level of the variable contained 90% or more of the subjects, total observed agreement is reported. Separate reliability estimates were calculated for pre-hospitalization and inpatient items. Subjects had a mean age of 78. Completion of pre-hospitalization and hospital period assessment (combined) required 20 and 30 minutes. Excluding items for which 90% or more of subjects were classified into a single scoring level, average inter-assessor reliability coefficient for the pre-hospital period items was 0.57 and for in hospital 0.58. Overall exact agreement was 83% for pre-hospitalization assessment items, and 79% for the in-hospital items. The reliability achieved in the highly unstable situation of the acute admission phase is sufficient for use in clinical care and research. Differences in pre-hospital and admission status necessary for case-mix adjusted comparison of outcomes were illustrated. Development of a means for systematically comparing changes in older people during the course of illness is of increasing importance when addressing questions of the appropriate and inappropriate use of medical technology.

Link

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dop...