The nature of safety problems among Canadian homecare clients: Evidence from the RAI‐HC© reporting system

TitleThe nature of safety problems among Canadian homecare clients: Evidence from the RAI‐HC© reporting system
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2009
AuthorsDoran DM, Hirdes J, Blais R, G Baker R, Pickard J, Jantzi M
JournalJournal of nursing management
Volume17
Issue2
Pagination165-174
Date PublishedMar
ISBN Number1365-2834 (Electronic)<br/>0966-0429 (Linking
Accession Number19416419
Keywords*Home Care Services, *Risk Management/statistics & numerical data, *Safety, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Manitoba, Medical Errors/*prevention & control, Middle Aged, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Risk Assessment
Abstract

AIM(S): The purpose of this study was to identify the nature of patient safety problems among Canadian homecare (HC) clients, using data collected through the RAI-HC((c)) assessment instrument. BACKGROUND: Problems of patient safety have been well documented in hospitals. However, we have very limited data about patient safety problems among HC clients. METHOD(S): The study methodology involved a secondary analysis of data collected through the Canadian home care reporting system. The study sample consisted of all HC clients who qualified to receive a RAI-HC assessment from Ontario, Nova Scotia and Winnipeg Regional Health Authority for the 2003-2007 reporting period. There were a total of 238 958 cases available for analysis; 205 953 from Ontario, 26 751 from Nova Scotia and 6254 from Winnipeg Regional Health Authority. RESULTS: New fall (11%), unintended weight loss (9%), new emergency room (ER) visits (7%) and new hospital visits (8%) were the most prevalent potential adverse events identified in our study. A small proportion of the HC clients experienced a new urinary tract infection (2%). CONCLUSION(S): Understanding clients' risk profiles is foundational to effective patient care management. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: We need to begin to develop evidence about best practices for ameliorating safety risk.

DOI10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00974.x