| Title | Comparison of the responsiveness of the FIM and the interRAI post acute care assessment instrument in rehabilitation of older adults |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2010 |
| Authors | Glenny C, Stolee P, Husted J, Thompson M, Berg K |
| Journal | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pagination | 1038-43 |
| Date Published | Jul |
| ISBN Number | 1532-821X<br/>0003-9993 (Linking) |
| Accession Number | 20537315 |
| Keywords | Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Female, Geriatric Assessment/ methods, Humans, Male, Musculoskeletal Diseases/ rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Modalities, Rehabilitation Centers |
| Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness of 2 major systems developed for rehabilitation settings--the FIM and the interRAI Post Acute Care (PAC) assessment--in older patients. DESIGN: Trained raters assessed patients with both tools at admission and discharge. SETTING: Musculoskeletal (MSK) and geriatric rehabilitation units (GRUs) in 2 rehabilitation hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults receiving rehabilitation (N=208; mean age +/- SD, 78.5+/-9.3; 67% women). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responsiveness was evaluated using effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM). RESULTS: ES and SRM were somewhat higher for the FIM motor (GRU ES=1.68, SRM=1.31; MSK ES=2.12, SRM=2.25) than the PAC (GRU ES=1.64, SRM=1.29; MSK ES=1.57, SRM=1.89) in both patient groups. Both tools were more responsive in MSKs than GRUs. This may reflect the greater frailty and clinical complexity of GRU patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both the FIM motor and the PAC were able to detect clinically relevant improvement in functional ability in older rehabilitation inpatients. |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.014 |
| Link | |
| Short Title | Arch Phys Med Rehabil |
| Alternate Journal | Arch Phys Med Rehabil |
