Title | Definitions Matter in Understanding Social Inclusion |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2011 |
Authors | Martin L, Cobigo V |
Journal | Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities |
Volume | 8 |
Issue | 4 |
Pagination | 276-282 |
Date Published | Dec |
ISBN Number | 1741-1122 |
Accession Number | WOS:000298017200007 |
Keywords | community participation, health, integration, Intellectual disability, interrai id, leisure, people, productive activities, social inclusion, social relationships |
Abstract | Social inclusion is an explicit goal of legislation, policies, and supports for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in many countries. However, evidence outlining the dimensions of social inclusion is still limited. How we understand social inclusion defines how it is measured. This study aims to better understand the concept and indicators of social inclusion. Retrospective analyses were conducted on 1,341 adults with intellectual disabilities residing in institutional and community-based settings who were assessed with the interRAI Intellectual Disability instrument. Objective and subjective items in the instrument related to five domains of social inclusion (i.e., relationships, leisure, productive activities, accommodations, and informal support). The results highlighted the heterogeneity within domains, and by the nature of the indicator. Overall, percentages varied between 3.0% and 96.4% depending on which indicator was used; variability also existed in rates achieved using objective and subjective indicators. Acceptable-to-good levels of internal consistency were reported for three of the five domains; low correlations were found to exist between some, but not all, domains. The results of this study demonstrate that without an understanding of what social inclusion means for both general and vulnerable populations, it is not clear what is being measured, or how it should be measured. A clear definition of inclusion and its measurement is needed for decision-makers and service providers to define the nature of their responsibilities, set actions, and assess their effectiveness in achieving inclusion. |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00316.x |
Link | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00316.x |
Short Title | J Policy Pract Intel |
Alternate Journal | J Policy Pract Intel |