Nursing home characteristics and the development of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour

TitleNursing home characteristics and the development of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication1999
AuthorsOoi W.L, Morris J.N, Brandeis G.H, Hossain M., Lipsitz L.A
JournalAge & Ageing
Volume28
Issue1
Pagination45-52
Date PublishedJan
Accession Number10203204
Keywords*Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders/ep [Epidemiology], *Health Care Surveys/td [Trends], *Nursing Homes/td [Trends], Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Comorbidity, Decubitus Ulcer, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Human, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Prevalence, Risk Factors, Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine how nursing home characteristics affect pressure sores and disruptive behaviour. METHOD: Residents (n = 5518, aged > or =60 years) were selected from 70 nursing homes in the National Health Care chain. Homes were classified as high- or low-risk based on incidence tertiles of pressure sores or disruptive behaviour (1989-90). Point-prevalence and cumulative incidence of pressure sores and disruptive behaviour were examined along with other functional and service variables. RESULTS: The overall incidence of pressure sores was 11.4% and the relative risk was 4.3 times greater in high- than low-risk homes; for disruptive behaviour, the incidence was 27% and the relative risk was 7.1 times greater in the high-risk group. At baseline, fewer subjects in homes with a high risk of pressure sores were white or in restraints, but more had received physician visits monthly and had had problems with transfers and eating. High-risk homes also had fewer beds and used less non-licensed nursing staff time. At follow-up (1987-90), 52% of homes in the low-risk group and 35% of those in the high-risk group had maintained their risk status; low-risk homes were more likely to have rehabilitation and maintenance activities. Having multiple clinical risk factors was associated with more pressure sores in high- (but not low-) risk homes, suggesting a care-burden threshold. By logistic regression, the best predictor of pressure sores was a home's prior (1987-88) incidence status. Interestingly, 67% of homes with a high risk of pressure sores were also high-risk for disruptive behaviour, while only 27% of homes with a low risk of pressure sores were high-risk for disruptive behaviour. A threshold effect was also observed between multiple risk factors and behaviour. More homes with a high risk of disruptive behaviour (68%) remained at risk over 4 years, and the best predictor of outcome was a home's previous morbidity level. CONCLUSION: Nursing-home characteristics may have a greater impact than clinical factors on pressure sores and disruptive behaviour in long-stay, institutionalized elders.

Alternate JournalAge Ageing