Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the Cognitive Performance Scale (Minimum Data Set) and the Mini-Mental State Exam for the detection of cognitive impairment in nursing home residents

TitleComparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the Cognitive Performance Scale (Minimum Data Set) and the Mini-Mental State Exam for the detection of cognitive impairment in nursing home residents
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2007
AuthorsPaquay L., De Lepeleire J., Schoenmakers B., Ylieff M., Fontaine O., Buntinx F.
JournalInt J Geriatr Psychiatry
Volume22
Issue4
Pagination286-93
Date PublishedApr
ISBN Number0885-6230 (Print)<br/>0885-6230 (Linking)
Accession Number17022109
Keywords*Homes for the Aged, *Nursing Homes, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders/*diagnosis/epidemiology, Decision Making, Dementia/*diagnosis/epidemiology, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Geriatric Assessment/*statistics & numerical data, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule/*statistics & numerical data, Netherlands, Neuropsychological Tests/*statistics & numerical data, Primary Health Care/standards, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of an outcome measurement scale of the Minimum Data Set of the Resident Assessment Instrument for nursing homes (MDS/RAI-NH), the Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS) and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) for the detection of cognitive impairment. The Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly--Revised (CAMDEX-R) was used as the reference standard. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This study was part of a larger prospective study (QUALIDEM) involving a diagnostic procedure and two-year follow-up on the quality of primary care for demented patients. CAMDEX-R and MDS/RAI-NH were administered to 198 residents, aged 65 or more, living in 42 low and high care institutions for aged people. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Indicators of diagnostic accuracy: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, odds ratio and area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS: The CAMDEX-based prevalence of cognitive impairment was 75%. The diagnostic values of a CPS score of two or more for the detection of cognitive impairment were: sensitivity = 0.81; specificity = 0.80; PPV = 0.92; NPV = 0.57. The diagnostic values of a MMSE score of less than or equal 23 were: sensitivity = 0.97; specificity = 0.59; PPV = 0.88; NPV = 0.85. For CPS, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91), and not significantly different (p = 0.63) from the MMSE score, 0.88 (0.83-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: CPS and MMSE demonstrated similar performance to detect cognitive impairment in nursing home residents.

DOI10.1002/gps.1671
Link

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17022109

Short TitleInt J Geriatr Psychiatry