Pan-Canadian quality indicators for patients at end of life derived from interRAI data

TitlePan-Canadian quality indicators for patients at end of life derived from interRAI data
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsSeow H, Harman L, Barbera L, Sutradhar R, McGrail K, Burge F, Lawson B, Chan K, Peacock S, Guthrie D
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume56
Issue6
Paginatione59-e60
Date PublishedDec
ISBN Number0885-3924
Accession NumberWOS:000451633700087
Abstract

RationaleCurrently in Canada, there are no standardized quality indicators (QIs) for end-of-life home care services. InterRAI assessment data are available in multiple provinces and contain patient-level symptom and performance status data for seriously-ill patients using home care services.ObjectiveTo report on novel QIs using interRAI data for seriously-ill cancer and non-cancer patients across Canada.MethodsWe undertook a cross sectional analysis of the Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) data from 2006-2016 for five provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Manitoba). Those eligible to be included in the QI rates had to have a prognosis of six months or less, a score of 4+ on the CHESS scale, or be assessed as palliative on admission into home care. 11 QI indicators were developed: prevalence of fall, caregiver distress, loneliness, inadequate pain control, constipation, negative mood, daily pain, delirium, any pressure ulcer, an ED visit, or hospital admission. We examined cancer and non-cancer separately.ResultsAmong 2,697,567 interRAI assessments across 5 provinces, 12,479 (cancer) and 26,877 (non-cancer) individuals were identified as seriously-ill and included in the cohort. The non-cancer cohort was older, more female, with more comorbidities than cancer cohort. Across Canada, QIs with the highest overall prevalence for cancer vs. non-cancer were daily pain (48% v. 43%), any hospital admission (46% v. 44%), and falls (40% v. 53%). Prevalence of caregiver distress (31% v. 43%), delirium (17% v. 26%), and inadequate pain control (21% v. 21%) were reported nationally. We also looked at the QI rates by province, which varied considerably.ConclusionsThis study advances the development of QIs for seriously-ill patients. It uses standardized and nationally-collected data via interRAI assessments to compare national and provincial QI rates. These QIs can act as decision-support tools to monitor quality over time and improve care for individuals at the end of life.

DOI10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.174
Short TitleJ Pain Symptom Manag
Alternate JournalJ Pain Symptom Manag