A comparison of 3 frailty measures and adverse outcomes in the intake home care population: a retrospective cohort study

TitleA comparison of 3 frailty measures and adverse outcomes in the intake home care population: a retrospective cohort study
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsSinn C-LJoanna, Heckman G, Poss JW, Onder G, Vetrano DLiborio, Hirdes J
JournalCanadian Medical Association Open Access Journal
Volume8
Issue4
PaginationE796-E809
Date PublishedOct-Dec
ISBN Number2291-0026
Accession Number33262118
KeywordsAdolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Frail Elderly/*statistics & numerical data, Geriatric Assessment/methods, Health Status Disparities, Home Care Services/*statistics & numerical data, Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data, Humans, Long-Term Care/*statistics & numerical data, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario/epidemiology, Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods, Predictive Value of Tests, Prevalence, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Young Adult
Abstract

Background: In Ontario, Canada, nearly all home care patients are assessed with a brief clinical assessment (interRAI Contact Assessment [interRAI CA]) on admission. Our objective was to compare 3 frailty measures that can be operationalized using the interRAI CA.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked patient-level assessment and administrative data for all Ontario adult (≥ 18 yr) home care patients assessed with the interRAI CA in 2014. We employed multivariable logistic models to compare the Changes in Health, End-stage disease and Signs and Symptoms Scale for the Contact Assessment (CHESS-CA), Assessment Urgency Algorithm (AUA) and the Frailty Index for the Contact Assessment (FI-CA) that was created for this study. Our outcomes of interest were death, hospital admission and emergency department visits within 90 days, and assessor-rated need for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).Results: In 2014, there were 228 679 unique adult home care patients in Ontario assessed with the interRAI CA. Controlling for age, sex and health region, being in a higher frailty level defined by any measure increased the likelihood of experiencing adverse outcomes. Among all assessments, CHESS-CA was best suited for predicting death and hospital admission, and either AUA or FI-CA for predicting perceived need for CGA. Previous emergency department visits were more predictive of future visits than frailty. Model fit was independent of whether the assessment was completed over the phone or in person.Interpretation: Frailty measures from the interRAI CA identified patients at higher risk for death, hospital admission and perceived need for CGA. In jurisdictions where the CHESS-CA and AUA are already built into the electronic home care platform, such as Ontario, patients identified as high risk should be prioritized for proactive referral and care planning, and may benefit from greater involvement of primary care and other health professionals in the circle of care.

DOI10.9778/cmajo.20200083
Custom 1

Competing interests: None declared.

PMCID

PMC7721251