Title | Using interRAI Assessment for Research: Developing a National Research Agenda in Aotearoa New Zealand |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2024 |
Authors | Hikaka JF, Chan AHY, Meehan B, Stent GL, Jamieson HA, Kerse NM, Cheung G |
Journal | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association |
Volume | 25 |
Issue | 6 |
Pagination | 104998 |
ISBN Number | 1538-9375 |
Accession Number | 38643969 |
Keywords | *quality improvement, Big data, Health Services Research, Humans, Needs Assessment, New Zealand, Patient-Centered Care, public health systems research, routinely collected health data |
Abstract | interRAI provides a suite of standardized, validated instruments used to assess health and psychosocial well-being, and to inform person-centered care planning. Data obtained from these standardized tools can also be used at a population level for research and to inform policy, and interRAI is currently used in more than 40 countries globally. We present a brief overview of the use of interRAI internationally within research and policy settings, and then introduce how interRAI is used within the universal public health system in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), including considerations relating to Māori, the Indigenous people of NZ. In NZ, improvement in interRAI data utilization for research purposes was called for from aged care, health providers, and researchers, to better use these data for quality improvement and health advancement for New Zealanders. A national research network has been established, providing a medium for researchers to form relationships and collaborate on interRAI research with a goal of translating routinely collected interRAI data to improve clinical care, patient experience, service development, and quality improvement. In 2023, the network members met (hybrid: in-person and online) and identified research priorities. These were collated and developed into a national interRAI research agenda by the NZ interRAI Research Network Working Group. Research priorities included reviewing the interRAI assessment processes, improving methods for data linkage to national data sets, exploring how Indigenous Data Sovereignty can be upheld, as well as a variety of clinically focused research topics. Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research: This appears to be the first time national interRAI research priorities have been formally identified. Priorities identified have the potential to inform quality and clinical improvement activities and are likely of international relevance. The methodology described to cocreate the research priorities will also be of wider significance for those looking to do so in other countries. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.03.109 |
Custom 1 | Disclosure All authors are members of the New Zealand interRAI Research Network. G.C., H.A.J., and B.M. are interRAI fellows. G.L.S. is an employee of Te Whatu Ora - interRAI NZ. N.M.K. is a member of the NZ interRAI Leadership Advisory Board. |