Strategies used during the cognitive evaluation of older adults with dual sensory impairment: a scoping review

TitleStrategies used during the cognitive evaluation of older adults with dual sensory impairment: a scoping review
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2024
AuthorsDumassais S., Pichora-Fuller M.K, Guthrie D., Phillips N.A, Savundranayagam M., Wittich W.
JournalAge Ageing
Volume53
Issue3
Date PublishedMar 1
ISBN Number1468-2834 (Electronic)<br/>0002-0729 (Print)<br/>0002-0729 (Linking)
Accession Number38506649
Keywords*aging, *Cognitive Dysfunction, Aged, Cognition, Cognitive evaluation, Communication, Databases, Factual, Dual sensory impairment, hearing impairment, Humans, Older people, scoping review, systematic review, visual impairment
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual sensory impairment (DSI), the combination of visual and hearing impairments, is associated with increased risk for age-related cognitive decline and dementia. Administering cognitive tests to individuals with sensory impairment is challenging because most cognitive measures require sufficient hearing and vision. Considering sensory limitations during cognitive test administration is necessary so that the effects of sensory and cognitive abilities on test performance can be differentiated and the validity of test results optimized. OBJECTIVE: To review empirical strategies that researchers have employed to accommodate DSI during cognitive testing of older adults. METHODS: Seven databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Global Health and the Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases) were searched for relevant articles integrating the three concepts of cognitive evaluation, aging, and DSI. Given the inclusion criteria, this scoping review included a total of 67 papers. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies reported five categories of strategies for cognitive testing of older adult participants with DSI: the assistance of experts, the modification of standardized test scoring procedures, the use of communication strategies, environmental modifications, and the use of cognitive tests without visual and/or auditory items. CONCLUSIONS: The most used strategy reported in the included studies was drawing on the assistance of team members from related fields during the administration and interpretation of cognitive screening measures. Alternative strategies were rarely employed. Future research is needed to explore the knowledge-to-practice gap between research and current clinical practice, and to develop standardized testing strategies.

DOI10.1093/ageing/afae051
Custom 1

None.

PMCID

PMC10953621